Informujemy, że Państwa dane osobowe są przetwarzane przez Fundację Instytut na Rzecz Kultury Prawnej Ordo Iuris z siedzibą w Warszawie przy ul. Górnośląskiej 20/6, kod pocztowy 00-484 (administrator danych) w celu informowania o realizacji działań statutowych, w tym do informowania o organizowanych akcjach społecznych. Podanie danych jest dobrowolne. Informujemy, że przysługuje Państwu prawo dostępu do treści swoich danych i możliwości ich poprawiania.
Skip to main content
PL | EN
Facebook Twitter Youtube

Settlement in the trial of Fr. prof. Dariusz Oko. The charge of "hate speech" dismissed

Published: 24.05.2022

Adobe Stock

· The court in Cologne did not pass a judgment in the case of Fr. prof. Dariusz Oko. The process ended with a settlement.

· The clergyman will contribute a voluntary amount of $ 3,000 euro for victims of sexual crimes.

· Initially, Fr. Dariusz Oko was sentenced to 4.8 thousand. Euro fines for alleged incitement to hatred in the text on the so-called lavender mafia.

· Ultimately, the prosecutor withdrew from prosecuting the Polish priest.

· Legal assistance of Fr. Dariusz Oko was granted the Ordo Iuris Institute.

The case concerned an article that appeared in the journal Theologisches. The text described the activities of the so-called lavender mafia, i.e. a group of interconnected people operating among the clergy who act to the detriment of minors and seminarians. This clique was connected with homosexual practices. Fr. Oko in his article referred to, inter alia, on the teaching of Popes Benedict XVI and Francis.

The clergyman received numerous expressions of support for his actions. The petition launched by Ordo Iuris in his defense was signed by approx. 85 thousand. people. On the side of the clergyman, among others, Cardinal Gerhard Müller from Germany, Archbishop Ján Orosch from Slovakia, Bishop Radoslav Zmitrovitch from Ukraine or Vladimir Palko, former vice-minister of internal affairs of Slovakia and a writer.

An appeal hearing was held in a court in Cologne in the trial of Fr. prof. Eye. The judge said she did not question the priest's findings on the activities of the "lavender mafia". She only pointed out that Fr. The eye should not use certain phrases in his works. Therefore, the prosecutor withdrew from the indictment, agreeing to the payment by the clergyman of the amount of PLN 3,000. euro for victims of sexual crimes.

Such a decision means that the article by Fr. prof. The eye can be further published. The clergyman can also publish his book in Germany The Lavender Mafia. The allegation of the alleged "hate speech" of Fr. The eye was therefore considered unfounded.

Civil liberties

19.04.2024

How to make up connections that will transform you into a Russian agent: narratives for destroying the Right

Although Russia exerts real and dangerous influence in the West, the traditional conservative Right is nevertheless being falsely accused of pro-Moscow activities. Among the methods most commonly used are:

Read more
Civil liberties

19.04.2024

Censorship and restriction of the presumption of innocence under the guise of combating violence: a draft EP directive

· A draft directive on combating violence against women is being discussed in the European Parliament. 

· This draft may raise concerns due to its extremely broad definition of ‘violence’, as well as the government’s mandate to censor ‘offensive’ online content or its obligation to combat ‘harmful gender stereotypes’.

· The directive may also entail a restriction of the presumption of innocence in cases of sexual offences, by indirectly presuming a man’s guilt.

Read more
Civil liberties

22.03.2024

Anti-SLAPP directive may contribute to stifling public debate

A few weeks ago the European Parliament adopted a directive on „protecting persons who engage in public participation from manifestly unfounded or abusive court proveedings” („strategic lawsuits against public participation” - SLAPP).

Read more
Civil liberties

13.03.2024

Narratives Scorning Trump are a Tool to Push the Americans Out of Europe

– European countries are taking advantage of the ignorance of public opinion in their countries in order to criticise Donald Trump at every opportunity.

Read more